0
6.9kviews
Explain operator precedence parser along with example.

Mumbai University > Computer Engineering > Sem6 > System Programming and Compiler Construction

Marks: 10M

Year: May 2015

1 Answer
0
32views

Precedence Relations

  • Bottom-up parsers for a large class of context-free grammars can be easily developed using operator grammars.
  • Operator grammars have the property that no production right side is empty or has two adjacent nonterminal.
  • This property enables the implementation of efficient operator-precedence parsers.
  • These parser rely on the following three precedence relations:
Relation Meaning
a <· b a yields precedence to b
a =· b a has the same precedence as b
a ·> b a takes precedence over b
  • These operator precedence relations allow to delimit the handles in the right sentential forms: <• marks the left end, =. appears in the interior of the handle, and .> marks the right end.

  • Let assume that between the symbols ai and ai+1 there is exactly one precedence relation. Suppose that $\$$ is the end of the string.

  • Then for all terminals we can write: $\$$ <• b and b •> $\$$. If we remove all nonterminal and place the correct precedence relation :<•, =•, •> between the remaining.

terminals, there remain strings that can be analyzed by easily developed parser.

  • For example, the following operator precedence relations can be introduced for simple expressions:

enter image description here

Example: The input string:

$id_1 + id_2 * id_3$

after inserting precedence relations becomes

$\$$ <• id1 •> + <• id2•>* <• id3 •> $\$$

  • Having precedence relations allows to identify handles as follows:

    -Scan the string from left until seeing •>

    -Scan backwards the string from right to left until seeing <•

    -Everything between the two relations <• and •> forms the handle.

Note that not the entire sentential form is scanned to find the handle.

Operator Precedence Parsing Algorithm

Initialize: Set ip to point to the first symbol of w$\$$

Repeat: Let X be the top stack symbol, and a the symbol pointed to by ip

If $ is on the top of the stack and ip points to $ then return
                Else
                Let a be the top terminal on the stack, and b the symbol pointed to by ip
                    If a<• b or a =• b then
                        Push b onto the stack
                        Advance ip to the next input symbol
                    Else if a •>bthen
                        repeat
                            Pop the stack
                        until the top stack terminal is related by <•
                            to the terminal most recently popped
                    else error ()
                end

Making Operator Precedence Relations

  • The operator precedence parsers usually do not store the precedence table with the relations, rather they are implemented in a special way.
  • Operator precedence parsers use precedence functions that map terminal symbols to integers, and so the precedence relations between the symbols are implemented by numerical comparison.
  • Not every table of precedence relations has precedence functions but in practice for most grammars such functions can be designed.

Algorithm for Constructing Precedence Functions

  1. Create functions $f_a$ for each grammar terminal a and for the end of string symbol;
  2. Partition the symbols in groups so that $f_a$ and $g_b$ are in the same group if a =• b (there can be symbols in the same group even if they are not connected by this relation);
  3. Create a directed graph whose nodes are in the groups, next for each symbols a and b do: place an edge from the group of $g_b$ to the group of fa if a <• b, otherwise if a •>b place an edge from the group of fa to that of $g_b$;

  4. If the constructed graph has a cycle then no precedence functions exist. When there are no cycles collect the length of the longest paths from the groups of fa and gb respectively.

Example: Consider the above table

enter image description here

Using the algorithm leads to the following graph:

enter image description here

From which we extract the following precedence functions:

- id + * $
f 4 2 4 0
g 5 1 3 0

Error Recovery in operator-precedence parsing:

There are two points in the parsing process at which an operator-precedence parser can discover syntactic error:

  • If no precedence relation holds between the terminal on top of the stack and the current input.
  • If a handle has been found, but there is no production with this handle as a right side.

The error checker does the following errors:

  • Missing operand
  • Missing operator
  • No expression between parenthesis
  • Illegal b on line (line containing b)
  • Missing d on line (line containing c)
  • Missing E on line (line containing b)

These error diagnostic issued at handling of errors during reduction.

During handling of shift/reduce errors; the diagnostic’s issues are:

  • Missing operand
  • Unbalanced right parenthesis
  • Missing right parenthesis
  • Missing operator

Advantages:

  • Simplicity, easy to construct by hand

Disadvantages:

  • It is hard to handle tokens like the unary operators
  • Since the relationship between a grammar for the language being parsed and the operator precedence parser itself is tenuous, one cannot always be sure the parser accepts exactly the desired language.

  • Only a small class of grammars can be parsed using operator-precedence techniques.

Please log in to add an answer.