0
633views
Compare TDMA, CDMA, FDMA and SDMA
1 Answer
written 3.5 years ago by | modified 2.5 years ago by |
Approach | SDMA | TDMA | FDMA | CDMA |
---|---|---|---|---|
Idea | Segment space into cells/sectors | Segment sending time into disjoint time-slots, demand driven or fixed patterns | Segment the frequency band into disjoint sub-bands | Spread the spectrum using orthogonal codes |
Terminals | Only one terminal can be active in one cell/ one sector | All terminals are active for short periods of time on the same frequency | Every terminal has its own frequency, uninterrupted | All terminal can be active at the same place at the same moment, uninterrupted |
Signal separation | Cell structure, directed antennas | Synchronization in the time domain | Filtering in the frequency domain | Code plus special receivers |
Advantages | Very simple, increases capacity per km2 | Established, fully digital, flexible | Simple established, robust | Flexible, less frequency planning needed, soft handover |
Dis-advantages | Inflexible, antennas typically fixed | Quard space needed (multipath propogation), synchronization difficult | Inflexible, frequencies are a scarce resource | Complex receivers, needs more complicate power control for senders |
Comment | Only in combination with TDMA, FDMA or CDMA useful | Standard in fixed networks, together with FDMA/SDMA used in many mobile networks | Typically combined with TDMA (frequency hopping patterns) and SDMA (frequency reuse) | Still faces some problems, higher complexity, lowered expectations; will be integrated with TDMA/FDMA |