0
45kviews
Compare Ad-hoc network and infrastructure network.
1 Answer
written 8.5 years ago by |
Parameters | Infrastructure mode | Ad-hoc mode |
---|---|---|
What is it? | In infrastructure mode, the communication occurs only between the wireless nodes and access points (AP) , but not directly between wireless nodes | In ad-hoc mode, each node communicates directly with other nodes, so no access point control is needed. |
External Communication | Access points acts as,a bridge to other wireless/wired network | Nodes in Ad-hoc can communicate if they are within the same range. |
Physical needs | Physical infrastructure is needed | No physical infrastructure is needed. |
Complexity | Designing is simple as most of the network functionality lies within AP and client is just a simple machine. | As no central co-ordination exists, we need to use decentralized MAC protocols such as CSMA/CA, with all nodes having same functionality. This shoots up the complexity and cost. |
When it can’t be used: | It can’t be used in critical situations like disaster relief where no infrastructure is left. | It is not always fully connected as two mobile nodes may temporarily be out of range. |
Applications | IEEE 802.11 & HIPERLAN2 are based on infrastructure mode. | Bluetooth is a typical ad-hoc network. |
Channel Access | Most infrastructure based WLAN uses TDMA-based protocols | Most Ad-hoc based WLAN uses contention MAC protocols (e.g. CSMA) |
Topology | Based on topology, one main advantage is the ability of infrastructure WLANs to provide wired network applications and services | Ad-hoc WLANs are easier to set-up and require no infrastructure |