written 8.2 years ago by | modified 6.6 years ago by |
Then continue as follows:-
For $m^{th}$ principal maximum,
$(a + b) sin θ = mλ → sin θ = \frac{mλ}{a + b}$
For minimum intensity in single slit
$a sin θ = nλ → sin θ = \frac{nλ}{a}$
If the two conditions are satisfied simultaneously,
$\frac{mλ}{a + b} = \frac{nλ}{a}$
$m = (\frac{a + b}{a}) n $
...This is the required expression for missing spectra.
.
Sometimes it happen that the first order spectrum is visible , second order is not visible ,third order is again visible and so on i,e some spectra’s are missing in the grating
We know , The resultant intensity is given by
$I_θ$ =[ $I_m$ $sin^2$ α ) / $α^2$ ][ $sin^2$ Nβ) / $sin^2$ β)]
$I_θ$ = $I_s$ X $I_g$
If $I_s$ =o then $I_θ$ =o irrespective of what value $I_g$ have.
i,e the condition of minima for single slit and for maxima in grating are satisfied together at a point on the screen. Then a particular maximum of order ‘m’ will be missing in the grating
for grating maxima is (a+b) sin θ = mλ ……………..(1)
for minima in single slit asinθ = nλ …………………(2)
(a+b)sinθ / asinθ= mλ / nλ
(a+b) / a= m / n
m= [(a+b) / a] n condition for absent spectra
Consider a case where b=a .i.e width of opaque part is same as that of slit.
Then m= [ (a+a)/a] n
Therefore, m =2n.
That means 2,4,6,8……..these orders will be missing in the spectra.